Home / Semester 2 / Business Environment & Legal Aspects / Performance of Contract, Termination & Remedies for Breach
← Exit to Hub
AKTU MBA Semester 2 • BMB 201 Unit 3: Law of Contract & Sale of Goods Est. Reading Time: 5 Mins

Performance of Contract, Termination & Remedies for Breach

MAuthored by mbanotes.in Academic Editorial Team
Verified Syllabus Alignment: AKTU MBA CoreTarget Score: 10/10 Marks (Section B/C)
Discharge of Contract
Termination of Obligation By performance, mutual agreement, supervening impossibility, or breach.
Frustration
Supervening Impossibility Contract becomes void when an unexpected event destroys subject matter or purpose.
Breach of Contract
Anticipatory vs Actual Repudiation before due date (anticipatory) vs failure on due date (actual).
Remedies
Hadley v Baxendale Rule Only natural or contemplated damages recoverable; remote damages disallowed.
Performance of Contract Discharge Modes Remedies for Breach of Contract Hadley v Baxendale Indian Contract Act 1872 Architecture BMB 201 Unit 3 Topic 6
Figure 3.6: Contractual Discharge Pathways and Legal Remedies for Breach under the Indian Contract Act 1872.

1. Performance of Contract & Tender of Performance

Performance of a contract takes place when the parties fulfill their reciprocal obligations within the stipulated time and manner (Section 37). Performance can be:

  • Actual Performance: When both parties carry out their respective promises completely.
  • Attempted Performance (Tender - Section 38): When the promisor offers to perform but the promisee refuses to accept. A valid tender discharges the promisor from non-performance liability.

2. Modes of Discharge (Termination) of Contract

1. By Mutual Consent (Sec 62):

Novation (substitution of new contract), Rescission (cancellation), Alteration (modifying terms), or Remission (accepting lesser fulfillment - Sec 63).

2. Supervening Impossibility (Sec 56):

Doctrine of Frustration: Destruction of subject matter (Taylor v. Caldwell), death or personal incapacity, outbreak of war, change of law.

3. By Lapse of Time:

If not enforced within the period prescribed by the Limitation Act (generally 3 years for debt recovery), the legal remedy is barred.

4. By Breach of Contract:

Actual Breach (refusal on due date) or Anticipatory Breach (repudiation before due date - Sec 39).

3. Legal Remedies for Breach of Contract

When a breach of contract occurs, the injured party is entitled to the following five classical legal remedies:

1. Suit for Damages (Section 73): Monetary compensation for loss naturally arising in the usual course of things. No compensation for remote or indirect damage (Hadley v. Baxendale).
2. Rescission of the Contract: The aggrieved party can cancel the contract and refuse further performance, and claim restitution under Section 75.
3. Suit upon Quantum Meruit: "As much as is earned" — when one party has partially executed work before the other wrongfully terminates, compensation for work completed.
4. Specific Performance: An equitable remedy where the court directs the defaulting party to carry out the exact contractual promise (e.g. unique land purchase).
5. Suit for Injunction: A court order restraining a party from doing a wrongful negative act (e.g. film actor under exclusive contract restrained from acting for rival studio).

4. Liquidated Damages vs. Penalty (Section 74)

In English law, Liquidated Damages (genuine pre-estimate of loss) are enforceable, while a Penalty (punitive deterrent sum) is void. In Indian law, Section 74 abolishes this rigid distinction: courts award only reasonable compensation not exceeding the stipulated penalty amount, based on actual loss suffered.

6. Landmark Legal Precedent: Hadley v. Baxendale (1854)

Court of Exchequer Ruling Measure of Damages Rule

Facts: Hadley, a mill owner, delivered a broken crankshaft to Baxendale (carrier) to be transported to Greenwich engineers as a pattern for casting a new one. The carrier delayed delivery by neglect. Because the mill was completely stopped without the shaft, Hadley lost substantial profits and sued the carrier for the lost profits.

Held: The carrier was not liable for loss of mill profits because Hadley had not informed Baxendale that the mill was idle and that shaft delay would cause mill stoppage. The court laid down the universal rule codified in Section 73: Damages are limited to (1) those arising naturally in the usual course, or (2) those reasonably in contemplation of both parties at the time of contract.

7. Solved AKTU Previous Years Questions (PYQs)

AKTU 2021-22, 2023-24 [Section A - 2 Marks] Direct Rule

Q1: What is the Doctrine of Frustration of contract?

Answer: Under Section 56 of the Indian Contract Act, the Doctrine of Frustration applies when an unforeseen supervening event beyond the control of both parties occurs after contract formation, rendering performance physically or legally impossible, or destroying the foundational commercial purpose. The contract automatically becomes void and both parties are discharged.

AKTU 2019-20, 2022-23 [Section B/C - 10 Marks] Comprehensive Legal Essay

Q2: Discuss the various modes of discharge of contract. What remedies are available to an aggrieved party in the event of a breach of contract? Explain with reference to Hadley v. Baxendale.

Model Answer Structure for Full 10 Marks:

  1. Introduction: Define discharge of contract as the termination of contractual obligations between parties.
  2. Modes of Discharge:
    • Discharge by performance (actual performance and valid tender).
    • Discharge by mutual consent (novation, rescission, alteration, remission).
    • Discharge by supervening impossibility/frustration (destruction of subject matter, government ban).
    • Discharge by breach (anticipatory vs actual).
    • Discharge by operation of law and lapse of limitation time.
  3. Remedies for Breach of Contract:
    • Suit for ordinary and special damages (Section 73). Detailed facts and ratio of Hadley v. Baxendale.
    • Rescission of contract (Section 75).
    • Suit for Quantum Meruit ("as much as earned").
    • Specific performance and injunction orders under the Specific Relief Act.
  4. Conclusion: Contractual remedies aim to place the aggrieved party in the financial position they would have occupied had the contract been performed.

Discussion & Questions

0 Comments

Academic insights, questions, and conceptual clarifications from students & faculty.

šŸ’¬

No questions or comments yet

Have a doubt about this topic, an exam tip, or a conceptual perspective? Start the discussion below!

Leave a Comment / Ask a Question

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Will not be shared or published.
Academic study discussions • Be constructive